The coal block allocation scandal, or the Coalgate, as it is popularly known; garnered international media attention when it came to light after the CAG office accused the Government of India of inefficiencies and irregularities in the process of allocation of coal blocks during 2004-2009. Coal is a precious natural resource and hence, coal blocks must be allocated to organisations following the process of competitive bidding. However, the then government chose to allocate these blocks in an arbitrary manner to various public and private enterprises. As a result, these companies paid much less than they might have otherwise, resulting in a massive loss of revenue to the state exchequer and windfall gains to the enterprises. Deepening the impact of loss to the government, it emerged that many companies had failed to develop their coal-fields after winning licenses without proper bidding. While the initial CAG report only talked of inefficiencies in the process, the question of corruption and bribery being involved came to dominate the discussion with the course of time. There was tremendous public outrage and anti-corruption demonstrations all over the country with opposition parties demanding the resignations of several ministers and authorities allegedly involved in the same, including the then Prime Minister, Dr. Man Mohan Singh.
Recent developments:
In July 2014, the Supreme Court of India set up a special CBI court to try cases arising from coal block allocation scam on a day-to-day basis. On 24th September, the Supreme Court cancelled 214 out of 218 coal blocks allocated since 1993 to steel, cement and power companies. Apart from the cancellation, the operational mines will also have to pay a penalty of Rs. 295 for every tonne of coal extracted since they commenced operations. For all the de-allocated coal blocks, the government is free to hold auctions or give them away to Coal India. The operational coal blocks have been given six months to wrap up their operations, after which these blocks will be handed over to Coal India. However, the power producers would not face a disruption in their supplies as Coal India would continue to provide coal to them.
Economic implications of the ruling:
1. Impact on the banking sector:
You might like reading:
The secret of Influencer Marketing
‘‘We’re entering an era of radical change for marketers. Faith in advertising and the institutions that pay for it is waning, while faith in individuals is on the rise” – Chris Anderson, The long tail The future will not be dominated by people who know the most about ‘The Quantum Theory’, nor those who can hit long sixes or take […]
How to Use Traditional & Folk Art to Make Indian Rural Consumers Sit Up & Take Notice
Engaging customer interest in the rural market also involves appealing to them through media that they can easily identify and associate with. India has a veritable treasure trove of traditional art forms that can be used to advertise products and services in the rural market while giving the advertising campaign a desi touch. The best part about using folk art and […]
This is great stuff Mohana; Your balance between data and analysis is always exemplary ❗ The banking sector part was especially a significant read. The Gross NPAs for PSBs here may well reach 4.7% according to some reports. Certainly a matter of grave concern.
Thanks a lot, Abhirup and Luna!! 🙂 🙂
Really Nice..keep it up
Superb analysis Mohana ! Great work !!