How often have you told the truth in an exit interview? A survey result shows that almost 90% of employees leaving an organization give very positive feedback and never disclose the true reasons why they are leaving. And this reason alone makes exit interviews a waste of time.
Taking a cue from scientific management, exit interviews were installed in most HR processes across corporates. The objective was to get a feedback on why the employee was leaving. This was also a last effort to retain the employee and also to take corrective action if too many employees are citing the same reasons.
But today they have become tick marks, one more step in a process that has neither value or any success. I feel that exit interviews are more like post mortem, which will let us know sometimes about the reason why the employee has terminated his relationship but will never be acted upon so the causes remain.
Let’s take a step back and see why employees leave organsiations?
According to Leigh Brahnam who wrote the book, “The 7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave,” the top seven reasons employees leave are:
- The job or workplace was not as expected
- Mismatch between job and the person
- Too little coaching and feedback
- Too few growth and advancement opportunities
- Feeling devalued and unrecognized
- Stress from overwork and work-life imbalance
- Loss of trust and confidence in senior leaders
Also in my opinion people leave their managers and never the organization. Often I have seen that it is easy to leave the company rather than to change their departments or move to new roles within the company. It may be interesting to note that monetary reasons do not feature in the top 7.
So once the employee has made up his mind and starts floating his resume, there is little that anyone can do and the Exit interview tends to be a waste of time.
I think the best time for intervention is before the feeling of stress and uncertainty sets into an employee. This is given by the Risk and Uncertainty Model given by Prosci please see the diagram below.
 |
| (Source: www.changemanagement.com) |
The intervention from the management and HR has to come before the employee enters the red zone. Once an employee is in red there is little chance that he would stay back in the organization.
Unless organizations are serious about retaining employees exit interviews will continue to be a tick mark and are a sheer waste of time.
You might like reading:
Redefining HR in the minds of the employees !
Nineteenth century ideas of employment relations find themselves ill-equipped, outmoded and counter-productive when applied to a liberal and knowledge-centric workforce of the day, no wonder HR may feel repressive, parochial and bureaucratic at times. We would like to take up employment life-cycle to show where exactly the HR practices are changing or should change for the better. The primary way […]
Understanding the concept of Planned Obsolescence
We all know about Godrej’s steel cupboards, which were present in almost everyone’s homes. The cupboards which refused to break down and were passed from one generation to the other. Well, they have vanished like those old times! Wikipedia defines ‘Planned Obsolescence’ as: “a policy of planning or designing a product with limited useful life, so it will become […]
