The coal block allocation scandal, or the Coalgate, as it is popularly known; garnered international media attention when it came to light after the CAG office accused the Government of India of inefficiencies and irregularities in the process of allocation of coal blocks during 2004-2009. Coal is a precious natural resource and hence, coal blocks must be allocated to organisations following the process of competitive bidding. However, the then government chose to allocate these blocks in an arbitrary manner to various public and private enterprises. As a result, these companies paid much less than they might have otherwise, resulting in a massive loss of revenue to the state exchequer and windfall gains to the enterprises. Deepening the impact of loss to the government, it emerged that many companies had failed to develop their coal-fields after winning licenses without proper bidding. While the initial CAG report only talked of inefficiencies in the process, the question of corruption and bribery being involved came to dominate the discussion with the course of time. There was tremendous public outrage and anti-corruption demonstrations all over the country with opposition parties demanding the resignations of several ministers and authorities allegedly involved in the same, including the then Prime Minister, Dr. Man Mohan Singh.
Recent developments:
In July 2014, the Supreme Court of India set up a special CBI court to try cases arising from coal block allocation scam on a day-to-day basis. On 24th September, the Supreme Court cancelled 214 out of 218 coal blocks allocated since 1993 to steel, cement and power companies. Apart from the cancellation, the operational mines will also have to pay a penalty of Rs. 295 for every tonne of coal extracted since they commenced operations. For all the de-allocated coal blocks, the government is free to hold auctions or give them away to Coal India. The operational coal blocks have been given six months to wrap up their operations, after which these blocks will be handed over to Coal India. However, the power producers would not face a disruption in their supplies as Coal India would continue to provide coal to them.
Economic implications of the ruling:
1. Impact on the banking sector:
You might like reading:
IFRS introduction in India – An opportunity to revitalize the Investor Relations Function
As any reader of the business press would know, IFRS is finally being made mandatory from FY12-13 onwards, with transition rules implying application of IFRS to FY11-12 period also for comparable prior period reporting. While reams have been written on how IFRS will change the face of financial reporting, management compensation etc, investor relations is an area which should undergo […]
Analysing the MINI- Not Normal campaign !
Not so long ago, MINI asked itself two important questions: -Who Are Our Customers? -And What Are We To Them? The answer lies in the high degree of correlation between both of them. Ever since MINI was conceived, it was different. A wild flower among shrubs, a peacock among pigeons, it has always stood out. And so has […]
This is great stuff Mohana; Your balance between data and analysis is always exemplary ❗ The banking sector part was especially a significant read. The Gross NPAs for PSBs here may well reach 4.7% according to some reports. Certainly a matter of grave concern.
Thanks a lot, Abhirup and Luna!! 🙂 🙂
Really Nice..keep it up
Superb analysis Mohana ! Great work !!