India, not by plans but by default is a mixed economy often leading to a conflict between what the state and the corporate demand. One of the many decisions resting with the government is that of taxation. Indian agricultural income, with the motive of promoting agriculture is currently exempt from income tax. 

In my opinion, agricultural income should be taxed like any other business income even in an agri-dominated country like India. The largest segment of the economy should not be left out of the tax net on the pretext that they grow food for the country. If a farm shows a profit it should be subject to corporate or at least lesser tax rates. A major chunk of Indian farmers are fragmented and have small land holdings. These incomes would anyway fall below the exempted threshold and hence there is no question of impacting the livelihood and employment. It is people earning above the exempted limit and not paying taxes only because the nature of business is supportive of agriculture who should be thought about. Both in Agriculture and other types of businesses, the motive remains profit. I see no reason why one should be left out of the tax ambit.  

The irony is that about one third of the parliament members are landlords holding hundreds of acres of agricultural land. Keeping the sector untaxed only indicates that 19% of the Indian GDP would still be untaxed and farmers earning billions of ‘green income’ would contribute zero to the country’s tax revenues. What worsens it further is the proposed subsidy bill of about $24 Billion which is being given out to these farmers, further adding to the income of the landlords. This dolling out of billions of rupees of subsidy on the agriculture sector is with a view to support the small farmers and help boost their incomes hoping for a high production. But, in reality it is the big landlords who have been the real beneficiaries in the name of small farmers and have contributed zilch to the national exchequer.

In many countries, any produce taken from the farm is considered as benefit in kind, not very different from a company car. In fact, it is the talked about introduction of an inheritance tax that will hinder agricultural growth and make it impossible for the heir to continue farming after the farm is passed on to them. This is the tax that is unfair to the farmer, not income tax. 

I fail to see why a person with an agriculture business should not pay for roads and infrastructure which is most needed in any agricultural area to ensure distribution which also happens to be a reason for price fluctuations of agri based commodities. Taxing agriculture could be the beginning of a rationalisation at a macro level, no matter what the political fallout is.   

Tags:

You might like reading:

Creating and Managing a Political Campaign on Facebook

If you are not on Facebook you are not on this world. With 82 Million active users, India is catching pace with the world to be on the social network. Most of these 82 million are young aspiring Indians, who do not believe in obstacles and really want to bring change. Facebook is the best platform to connect and engage […]

0 comments

Branding strategy of Fair and Lovely

“With the consumers brand is also growing, With the modernization of consumer, brand is also modernizing, With the transformation of women, brand is also transforming with their changing needs.”   The tube of Fair and lovely has its presence in many homes whether they are rich or poor, rural or urban. It is the favourite of women of different age groups ranging […]

0 comments
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Follow us

©2010-2023 IdeasMakeMarket.com |Contact Us | T&C | Privacy Policy

 

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account